Liquidity Pool Risks on Solana

Depegging Risks

Liquid staking tokens (LSTs) can depeg from their underlying assets due to market conditions or liquidity crises. For example, stSOL on Solana traded at a ~10% discount during the FTX collapse due to fears of validator slashing or protocol risks. "During the FTX/Solana liquidity crisis (November 2022), stSOL traded at a ~10% discount due to fears of Solana validator slashing or protocol risks."
Exploits and vulnerabilities in smart contracts can cause LSTs to crash. Ankr's aETH crashed to near-zero after an attacker minted trillions of tokens due to a private key leak. "In December 2022, Ankr suffered a smart contract exploit where an attacker minted 20 trillion aETH due to a private key leak."
Sudden sell pressure or redemption delays can lead to depegging. Prior to Ethereum's Shapella upgrade, stETH couldn't be redeemed immediately, contributing to its depeg. "Redemption Delays: Before Ethereum’s Shapella upgrade, stETH couldn’t be redeemed immediately."

Impermanent Loss

Providing liquidity for volatile token pairs can result in impermanent loss (IL). When the price of one asset in the pool changes significantly relative to the other, the value of your LP position can be less than if you had simply held the assets. "Long term LP on a pair that contains at least one non-stablecoin is almost never profitable."
IL is exacerbated by price movements, where you lose more when an asset drops and gain less when it recovers. If SOL price falls in a SOL/USDC LP, your position shifts to majority SOL, exposing you to value loss, while recovery means your position shifts to majority USDC, limiting gains. "If SOL price falls and you're in a SOL/USDC LP, your position will shift to be majority SOL, exposing you severely to the value loss of SOL."

Smart Contract and Protocol Risks

Liquidity pools introduce an additional layer of complexity where things can go wrong due to smart contract bugs or exploits. This extra layer of risk is present even with seemingly normalized liquid staking. "There is more risk in the sense there is one additional layer of complexity where things can go wrong."
Placing funds into a liquidity pool means trusting the protocol's security. If a protocol is exploited or "rugged," you can lose both the token value and the paired SOL. "Because if they rug the token, you lose the token value plus your sol thats paired with the token, basically losing double."

Liquidity and Slippage Concerns

Low liquidity can lead to significant price impact and slippage, especially with large trades. Attempting to sell a large amount of a token from a low-liquidity pool can drastically drop its price, making it difficult to cash out profitably. "If you make a buy that's double the size of the liquidity pool, you will immediately have everyone else who currently holds dumping on you because the price will go up a ridiculous amount and they will cash out."
The market capitalization of a token does not directly equate to its available liquidity for trading. A high market cap token can still have low liquidity in its pools, impacting trade execution. "You could have 10 trillion billion worth of a coin but if the Liquidity isn't there it's worth about as much as the big dump I'm taking right now."

Are you interested in understanding specific strategies to mitigate these risks when providing liquidity on Solana?

Bottom line

When using Solana liquidity pools, Users highlight risks such as impermanent loss, smart contract vulnerabilities, and depegging of liquid staking tokens. These risks can lead to significant financial losses for liquidity providers.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the conversation.